4.6 Article

Rational regulation ultra-microporous structure size for enhanced potassium ion storage performance

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 378, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138141

关键词

Ultra-microporous carbon; Pore size; NH4F; Potassium-ion hybrid capacitors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971104, 51762031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experiment reveals that the pore size of porous carbon materials plays a crucial role in potassium ion storage, and adjusting the pore size can enhance battery performance. The optimized SROM-15 exhibits excellent electrochemical properties and can be used for preparing high-performance electrode materials.
The traditional views consider that the interlayer spacing is the major factor controlling battery performance due to the intercalation mechanism, but we find that the pore size of porous carbon in potassium ion storage is the most important factor determining battery electrochemical performance, because the adsorption mechanism occupies the leading position in the process of contributing energy. Herein, we prepare the short-range order ultra-microporous carbon (SROM) through physical grinding following a pyrolysis method. The optimized SROM-15 as anodes in the potassium-ion batteries delivers a remarkable reversible capacity of 264.2 mA h g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1) after 100 cycles, superior rate capacity (149.1 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1)), and excellent cycling life. The electrochemical properties of SROM-15 are better than most reported carbon materials. This experiment has demonstrated that when the pore size is adjusted to 0.84 nm, the specific capacity and K+ diffusion coefficient of SROM are the largest. In addition, the potassium-ion hybrid capacitors fabricated using SROM-15 anodes and corn stalk-derived activated carbons cathodes display outstanding specific energy of 50.6 W h kg(-1) at specific power of 4500 W kg(-1). (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据