4.6 Article

Modelling capacity fade in silicon-graphite composite electrodes for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 377, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138067

关键词

Silicon-composite electrode; Finite element modelling; Electrode morphology; Microcracks; Effective diffusivity

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency [40466-1]
  2. SweGRIDS
  3. STandUP for Energy
  4. Norwegian Research Council [255195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical simulations were used to study the electrochemical and morphological behavior of silicon-based composite electrodes during galvanostatic cycling. The study revealed that changes in electrode porosity and growth of solid electrolyte interphase layer play a crucial role in influencing electrode performance.
Silicon-based composite electrodes in lithium ion batteries attract increasing attention because of their high theoretical capacity. Here, numerical simulations are used to better understand the interplay between electrochemical and morphological behavior of the silicon-graphite (1:2.7) composite electrode during galvanostatic cycling. Finite element methodology is used to solve a one-dimensional model based on the porous electrode and concentrated solution theory. Porosity changes in the silicon electrode and solid electrolyte interphase layer growth are also included in the model. The simulation results show that at lower rates, the electrode with high initial porosity is being fully utilized before the lower cut-off potential is reached. When comparing the computational results with experimental observations, it can be seen that the main reason for capacity fade is the increase in tortuosity in the diffusion pathway of lithium ions due to cracking of the silicon composite electrode upon electrochemical cycling. ? 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据