4.6 Article

Fault classification in power system distribution network integrated with distributed generators using CNN

期刊

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106914

关键词

Power system; Distribution network; Deep learning; Distributed generators; Convolutional Neural Network; Fault classification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a deep learning algorithm, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), customized for fault classification in distributed networks integrated with DGs, achieving high accuracy through 10-fold cross-validation. Compared to conventional approaches, this method shows better performance in terms of accuracy and computation burden.
Fault detection is the critical stage of the relaying system and their successful completion in minimum time is expected for fault clearance. With the increasing usage of distributed generators (DGs) in a distribution network, the conventional relaying methods are becoming inappropriate due to changing fault current levels. This paper presents a deep learning algorithm i.e. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) customized for fault classification in the distributed networks integrated with DGs. This is first time that CNN has been used for fault detection using raw and sampled-data of three-phase voltage and current signals of various fault classes and no-fault class. The 10-fold cross-validation is used to demonstrate the performance of the proposed model in terms of different metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score. The proposed model has attended an average 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 99.52% for all the tested fault cases. This featureless proposed method has been compared with conventional approaches from literature and has shown better performance in terms of accuracy and computation burden. Further, a similar fault study is conducted on a mixed transmission line and distribution network with PV as DG using the proposed method and found performance accuracy of 99.92% and 99.97%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据