4.8 Article

Ecology and evolutionary biology must elevate BIPOC scholars

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 913-919

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13716

关键词

Anti‐ racism; BIPOC; climate; ecology; EEB; evolution; outreach; two‐ eyed seeing; URM

类别

资金

  1. Fathom Fund grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article calls for action within the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB) Academy to increase representation and equity for BIPOC graduate scholars in the field, outlining four actionable ideas: anti-racism education and practice, increased funding opportunities, integration of diverse cultural perspectives, and a community-focused shift in PhD programs. The advice is directed at those in power within the Academy, aiming to address the lack of diversity and underrepresentation of BIPOC individuals in EEB.
Black, Indigenous and people of colour (BIPOC) individuals are disproportionately impacted by the negative consequences of our ongoing environmental and climate crises, yet their valuable scientific voices are shockingly underrepresented within the fields of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB). As early-career BIPOC EEB researchers, we recognise the key role that our fields play in understanding and mitigating the effects of our ongoing global crises, and are concerned about the lack of diversity we see among our own EEB cohorts and mentors. We present this piece as a call to action for the EEB Academy, drawing on our own experiences and the literature to suggest steps the Academy must take to increase representation of and equity for BIPOC graduate scholars in EEB. We synthesise these steps into four actionable ideas: anti-racism education and practice, increased funding opportunities, integration of diverse cultural perspectives and a community-minded shift in PhDs. Importantly, this advice is specifically directed at those who wield power in the Academy (e.g. funding agencies, societies, institutions, departments and faculty), rather than BIPOC scholars already struggling against inequitable frameworks in EEB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据