4.7 Article

Studies on the photofading of alizarin, the main component of madder

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 185, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108940

关键词

Natural dyes; Alizarin; Photofading progress of alizarin; Photooxidation; Hydrolysis of pre-mordant

资金

  1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Biomass Fiber and Ecological Dyeing and Finishing Open Fund [184083027]
  2. National Project Cultivation Plan [193137]
  3. PhD research startup foundation of Wuhan Textile University [205050]
  4. Special Project of the Central Committee Guides Local Science and Technology Development of Hubei Province [2019ZYYD073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the photo-fading progress of alizarin-dyed fabrics, revealing the photodegradation mechanism of natural dyes, as well as the impact of pre-mordant and liquid rate on the fading process.
Natural dyes have been the focus of textile industry for their environmental protection properties. However, some limitations such as poor photostability has limited their wide application, and the researches of the discoloration mechanism of fabric with natural dye are relatively limited. As one of the most important natural dye, madder has been widely used in textile field. Herein, as the main pigment of madder, alizarin was selected as the model natural dye to explore the photo-fading progress of alizarin-dyed fabrics. The photodegradation progress of alizarin was explored by UV, HPLC, HPLC-MS and Datacolor (computer color matching system). When exposed to light, alizarin could be oxidized into colorless small molecules through center dot OH radical-mediated route, and finally resulting in the fading of alizarin. In addition, the influence of pre-mordant and the liquid rate has also been studied. These results provide us a good insight into the photo-fading progress of natural dyes, and our work could help to open the way to further studies aiming at improving the photostability of natural dyes or developing new photo-stable dyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据