4.4 Article

Fall-related events in people who are lower limb prosthesis users: the lived experience

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 44, 期 15, 页码 3897-3908

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1891467

关键词

Accidental falls; amputation; qualitative research; artificial limb

资金

  1. Otto Bock Healthcare LP
  2. Ossur RD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to explore the experiences of lower limb prosthesis users related to falls and identify common themes. Focus groups conducted with users from across the United States revealed six main themes related to fall events. These themes included factors such as time, location, activities, and the involvement of the prosthesis in falls.
Purpose To explore lived experiences, and identify common themes as well as vocabulary associated with fall-related events in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. Materials and methods Five focus groups of LLP users from across the United States were conducted remotely via video or tele-conferencing. Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using methods adapted from a grounded theory approach to identify themes. Results Focus group participants (n = 25) described experiences associated with fall-related events that resulted in the identification of six themes: (1) memories of fall-related events are shaped by time and context, (2) location and ground conditions influence whether falls occur, (3) some activities come with more risk, (4) fall-related situations are multi-faceted, and often involve the prosthesis, (5) how LLP users land, but not the way they go down, tends to vary, and (6) not all falls affect LLP users, but some near-falls do. Conclusion Consideration for where LLP users fall, what they are doing when they fall, how they fall, what occurs as a result of a fall, and how well memory of a fall persists may enhance recording and reporting of falls, contribute to development of improved fall risk assessment tools, and inspire the design and function of prosthetic componentry for patient safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据