4.1 Review

Cervical cancer: Automation of Pap test screening

期刊

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 559-574

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dc.24708

关键词

automated cytology screening; cervical cancer; false‐ negatives; Pap test; quality control

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [06/2015 - 306396/2015-7, 06/2019 305895/2019-2, 472565/2011-7]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [88882.459660/2019-01]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [APQ-00802-11, APQ-02369-14, APQ-03740-17]
  4. Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pos-Graduacao e Inovacao universidade federal de ouro preto [23109.003209/2016-98, 23109.003515/2018-96, 23109.003517/2018-85]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the feasibility of implementing automatic methods in cervical cancer screening, and found that AMs have advantages in diagnostic performance and reducing false-negatives, as well as reducing sample rejection rates.
Background Cervical cancer progresses slowly, increasing the chance of early detection of pre-neoplastic lesions via Pap exam test and subsequently preventing deaths. However, the exam presents both false-negatives and false-positives results. Therefore, automatic methods (AMs) of reading the Pap test have been used to improve the quality control of the exam. We performed a literature review to evaluate the feasibility of implementing AMs in laboratories. Methods This work reviewed scientific publications regarding automated cytology from the last 15 years. The terms used were Papanicolaou test and Automated cytology screening in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, in the three scientific databases (SCIELO, PUBMED, MEDLINE). Results Of the resulting 787 articles, 34 were selected for a complete review, including three AMs: ThinPrep Imaging System, FocalPoint GS Imaging System and CytoProcessor. In total, 1 317 148 cytopathological slides were evaluated automatically, with 1 308 028 (99.3%) liquid-based cytology slides and 9120 (0.7%) conventional cytology smears. The AM diagnostic performances were statistically equal to or better than those of the manual method. AM use increased the detection of cellular abnormalities and reduced false-negatives. The average sample rejection rate was <= 3.5%. Conclusion AMs are relevant in quality control during the analytical phase of cervical cancer screening. This technology eliminates slide-handling steps and reduces the sample space, allowing professionals to focus on diagnostic interpretation while maintaining high-level care, which can reduce false-negatives. Further studies with conventional cytology are needed. The use of AM is still not so widespread in cytopathology laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据