4.7 Article

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for the prevention of cardiorenal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: An updated meta-analysis

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 1672-1676

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14374

关键词

canagliflozin; cardiorenal outcomes; dapagliflozin; empagliflozin; ertugliflozin; sotagliflozin; type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis evaluates the cardiorenal outcomes of SGLT-2is in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding that SGLT-2is are associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and significant benefits in the progression of diabetic kidney disease. There was no significant heterogeneity observed based on the presence or absence of cardiovascular disease in patients.
A meta-analysis of cardiorenal outcomes of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) available in Europe or the United States in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is presented. An electronic search up to 6 January 2021 was conducted to determine eligible trials. A total of eight cardiorenal outcomes trials of SGLT-2is (empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, ertugliflozin and sotagliflozin) were identified, with 65,587 patients. Data were analysed using a random effects model. Overall, SGLT-2is were associated with a 12% reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; HR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; Q statistic, p = .19), with no significant heterogeneity (p for interaction = .465) between subgroups of patients with or without cardiovascular disease (CVD). The risk of the composite renal outcome was significantly reduced by treatment with SGLT-2is (HR = 0.61, 95% CI, 0.54-0.70), with no significant heterogeneity of associations with outcome (I-2 = 37%, p = .11), and no difference in the risk between patients with or without CVD (p for interaction = .665). SGLT-2is have moderate benefits on MACE and major benefits on the progression of diabetic kidney disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据