4.7 Article

Homology-directed repair protects the replicating genome from metabolic assaults

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 461-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.01.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF14CC0001, NNF15CC0001]
  2. Danish Cancer Society [R204 A12615]
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research [EDFF-FSS 82262]
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R264-2017-2819]
  5. Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [846795]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [846795] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase leads to metabolic imbalance and accumulation of reactive oxygen species in cell nuclei, triggering a cascade of reactions involving ATM kinase and MRE11 nuclease. This process affects DNA replication and repair, impacting cancer evolution and tumor therapy.
Homology-directed repair (HDR) safeguards DNA integrity under various forms of stress, but how HDR protects replicating genomes under extensive metabolic alterations remains unclear. Here, we report that besides stalling replication forks, inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) triggers metabolic imbalance manifested by the accumulation of increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell nuclei. This leads to a redox-sensitive activation of the ATM kinase followed by phosphorylation of the MRE11 nuclease, which in HDR-deficient settings degrades stalled replication forks. Intriguingly, nascent DNA degradation by the ROS-ATM-MRE11 cascade is also triggered by hypoxia, which elevates signaling-competent ROS and attenuates functional HDR without arresting replication forks. Under these conditions, MRE11 degrades daughterstrand DNA gaps, which accumulate behind active replisomes and attract error-prone DNA polymerases to escalate mutation rates. Thus, HDR safeguards replicating genomes against metabolic assaults by restraining mutagenic repair at aberrantly processed nascent DNA. These findings have implications for cancer evolution and tumor therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据