4.7 Article

Box office sales and social media: A cross-platform comparison of predictive ability and mechanisms

期刊

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113517

关键词

Predictive analytics; Social media; Machine learning; Data mining; Box office sales; Marketing analytics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research shows that social media data significantly increases the predictive power of traditional box office prediction models. Facebook data outperforms Twitter data and including user-generated content consistently improves predictive power. Combination variables based on volume and valence of Facebook comments are identified as the most important variables.
This paper aims to determine the power of social media data (Facebook and Twitter) in predicting box office sales, which platforms, data types and variables are the most important and why. To do so, we compare several models based on movie data, Facebook data, and Twitter data. We benchmark these model comparisons using various prediction algorithms. Next, we apply information-fusion sensitivity analysis to evaluate which variables are driving the predictive performance. Our analysis shows that social media data significantly increases the predictive power of traditional box office prediction models. Facebook data clearly outperform Twitter data and including user-generated content next to marketer-generated always improves predictive power. Our sensitivity analysis reveals that volume and valence based combination variables pertaining to Facebook comments are the most important variables. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth analysis of the potential mechanisms driving differential predictive ability of Facebook and Twitter. Our findings suggest that Twitter has less of an impact on box office sales than Facebook because Twitter users have less source credibility than Facebook users. Our results are important for practitioners, marketers and academics who want to employ social media data for box office sales predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据