4.2 Review

How common is primary aldosteronism?

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000702

关键词

Conn's syndrome; hypertension; prevalence; primary aldosteronism; primary hyperaldosteronism

资金

  1. Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) Program New Investigator Award [2019KP-NIA626990]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary aldosteronism is more prevalent than previously thought, with many cases still undetected.
Purpose of review Primary aldosteronism, characterized by renin-independent aldosterone secretion from one or both adrenal glands, is the most common and modifiable form of secondary hypertension. The prevalence of primary aldosteronism is increasingly recognized to be much higher than previously thought with many cases still undetected. Recent findings Prior prevalence studies on primary aldosteronism have reported a wide range of estimates due to heterogeneity of both disease definitions and study populations such that it is difficult to claim a single point estimate. More recent evidence demonstrates that primary aldosteronism, as defined by conventional biochemical diagnostic criteria, is highly prevalent within populations where it is not typically considered such as mild-to-moderate hypertension, prehypertension, and even normotension. Yet, our current screening approach fails to capture many cases. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that renin-independent aldosteronism exists as a continuum of disease that extends below the current biochemical diagnostic thresholds used to define primary aldosteronsim and has clinically relevant treatment and outcome implications for a much broader patient population. Indeed, much of what we current label as 'essential hypertension' is, in fact, renin-independent aldosterone-mediated hypertension. Primary aldosteronism and milder forms of renin-independent aldosteronism are highly prevalent, yet vastly under-recognized, in the general population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据