4.5 Review

Frameworks for Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation Addressing When, What, and How

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11910-021-01096-0

关键词

Parkinson’ s disease; Physical therapy; Occupational therapy; Speech-language pathology; Rehabilitation; Healthcare delivery models

资金

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Neurotoxin Exposure Treatment Parkinson's [W81XWH-19-PRP-EIRA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes evidence on rehabilitation for people with Parkinson's disease, emphasizing the importance of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology soon after diagnosis. It proposes three pathways for rehabilitation care to assess and treat early deficits, promote functional improvements, and provide long-term monitoring.
Purpose of Review This review summarizes the evidence on rehabilitation for people with Parkinson's disease, including when to refer, what rehabilitation professionals should address, and how to deliver rehabilitation care. Recent Findings Clinical practice guidelines support physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology for Parkinson's disease. However, integrating guidelines into practice may be difficult. Implementation studies take into account patient and clinician perspectives. Synthesizing guidelines with implementation research can improve local delivery. There is moderate to strong evidence supporting physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology soon after diagnosis and in response to functional deficits. We propose a framework of three pathways for rehabilitation care: (1) consultative proactive rehabilitation soon after diagnosis for assessment, treatment of early deficits, and promotion meaningful activities; (2) restorative rehabilitation to promote functional improvements; and (3) skilled maintenance rehabilitation for long-term monitoring of exercise, meaningful activities, safety, contractures, skin integrity, positioning, swallowing, and communication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据