4.8 Article

Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1788-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.079

关键词

-

资金

  1. Oxford-NaturalMotion graduate scholarship
  2. UK Government's Darwin Initiative [25-015]
  3. UK Research and Innovation's Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) through the Trade, Development and the Environment Hub project [ES/S008160/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Our Planet Our Health (Livestock, Environment and People) [205212/Z/16/Z]
  6. Research Council of Norway [295650]
  7. ESRC [ES/S008160/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the strained relationship between humanity and nature, with calls for cessation of wild meat trade and consumption. However, the complete removal of wild meat could shock global food systems, especially in food-insecure developing nations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought humanity's strained relationship with nature into sharp focus, with calls for cessation of wild meat trade and consumption, to protect public health and biodiversity.(1,2) However, the importance of wild meat for human nutrition, and its tele-couplings to other food production systems, mean that the complete removal of wild meat from diets and markets would represent a shock to global food systems.(3-6)The negative consequences of this shock deserve consideration in policy responses to COVID-19. We demonstrate that the sudden policy-induced loss of wild meat from food systems could have negative consequences for people and nature. Loss of wild meat from diets could lead to food insecurity, due to reduced protein and nutrition, and/or drive land-use change to replace lost nutrients with animal agriculture, which could increase biodiversity loss and emerging infectious disease risk. We estimate the magnitude of these consequences for 83 countries, and qualitatively explore how prohibitions might play out in 10 case study places. Results indicate that risks are greatest for food-insecure developing nations, where feasible, sustainable, and socially desirable wild meat alternatives are limited. Some developed nations would also face shocks, and while high-capacity food systems could more easily adapt, certain places and people would be disproportionately impacted. We urge decision-makers to consider potential unintended consequences of policy-induced shocks amidst COVID-19; and take holistic approach to wildlife trade interventions, which acknowledge the interconnectivity of global food systems and nature, and include safeguards for vulnerable people.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据