4.4 Article

Improving the performance of pure sulfide Cu(InGa)S2 solar cells via injection annealing system

期刊

CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 71-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2020.12.004

关键词

Cu(InGa)S-2; Injection annealing system; Secondary phase; Tandem cell; Top cell; Pure sulfide

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF2018R1A5A1025594]
  2. Pusan National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an effective method of improving the performance of pure sulfide CIGS solar cells through an injection annealing system, which effectively removes secondary phase InSx from the surface of CIGS thin films. As the annealing temperature increases, the open-circuit voltage and fill factor of CIGS devices gradually increase, possibly due to the decrease in bulk defects. Ultimately, a pure sulfide CIGS solar cell with an efficiency of 12.16% was achieved via the injection annealing system.
In this study, we present an effective method of improving the performance of pure sulfide Cu(InGa)S-2 (CIGS) solar cells via injection annealing system. The injection annealing system can perform annealing at desired temperatures, and therefore, the CIGS thin film passed over the temperature range in which secondary phases occurs. Via the injection annealing system, secondary phase InSx was effectively removed from the surface of the CIGS thin films at the temperatures over 550 degrees C. This resulted in the formation of good-quality P-N junction CIGS devices, thereby improving significantly the performance of the CIGS solar cell. In addition, the open-circuit voltage (V-OC) and fill factor (FF) of the CIGS devices increased gradually with increasing annealing temperature in the range of 550-640 degrees C. It is speculated that the bulk defects were decreased as the annealing temperature increased. Finally, via injection annealing system, a pure sulfide CIGS solar cell with an efficiency of 12.16% was achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据