4.5 Article

Performance of novel sorghum germplasm in Pennsylvania and their response to anthracnose

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 2612-2627

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20486

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. USDA-NIFA [2011-67009-30017]
  2. Fundacion Alfonso Martin Escudero
  3. AES [PEN04330, PEN04613]
  4. NIFA [2011-67009-30017, 579752] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the distribution of Colletotrichum sublineola in sorghum fields in Pennsylvania and discovered sources of resistance to anthracnose and other foliar diseases in sorghum varieties and hybrids.
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) has the potential to become a widespread commercial feedstock crop in Pennsylvania, either in rotation with maize (Zea mays L.) or grown alongside it. In other locations where sorghum has been grown for a long time, it is attacked by Colletotrichum sublineola Henn. ex Sacc. & Trotter, a fungal pathogen that causes anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineola) leaf blight (ALB), thereby diminishing yield. Field surveys were carried out in 2011, 2012, and 2016 to monitor the presence of C. sublineola in commercial sorghum fields in six Pennsylvania locations. Senescing, lower leaves developed lesions that yielded Colletotrichum sp., including isolates of C. sublineola. The pathogen was not recovered from field debris, and ALB symptoms were not observed on the younger leaves of plants. In preparation for widespread cultivation of sorghum in Pennsylvania, we evaluated the performance, in field and greenhouse tests, of 158 experimental lines and commercial hybrids, which had been improved in several states in the United States and in other parts of the world. Sources of resistance to ALB and other foliar diseases were discovered that should be useful in breeding programs targeted for Pennsylvania and for northeastern U.S. climatic conditions. Lines received from ICRISAT, especially ICSB94, showed the highest level of resistance in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据