4.7 Article

Compatibility and rheological characterization of asphalt modified with recycled rubber-plastic blends

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121416

关键词

Recycled rubber-plastic blends; Asphalt modification; Rheological properties; Compatibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on improving the compatibility of asphalt modified with recycled plastic and rubber, which has shown significant enhancement in physical properties through the increase of recycled rubber content, addition of compatibilizer, and use of pre-combined recycled rubber-plastic blends. These improvements present a promising pathway for large-scale commercial applications of plastic and rubber modified asphalt.
The use of recycled plastic and rubber for asphalt modification is gaining increasing attention for the development of sustainable pavements. However, phase separation among the rubber, plastic, and asphalt remains a major challenge for a large-scale field application. In this study, several approaches were tested to improve the compatibility of the modified binder blends including the increase of recycled rubber content, the addition of compatibilizer, and the use of pre-commingled recycled rubber-plastic blends. The rheological properties and microstructure of the modified asphalt were evaluated by using dynamic shear rheometer tests and optical microscopy, respectively. Furthermore, the compatibility of the binder blends was characterized using the cigar tube test. Compared with adding plastic and rubber independently or with additional compatibilizer, the asphalt modified with the pre-combined recycled rubber-plastic blends showed a significant improvement of the compatibility, resulting in enhanced physical properties, which present a promising pathway to large-scale commercial applications of plastic and rubber modified asphalt. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据