4.7 Article

Synergistic effect of EVA, TEA and C-S-Hs-PCE on the hydration process and mechanical properties of Portland cement paste at early age

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121891

关键词

Triethanolamine; EVA; C-S-Hs-PCE; Hydration process; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578412, 51878479, 52078372]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the synergistic utilization of EVA, TEA, and C-S-Hs-PCE as admixtures in Portland cement, revealing that the addition of admixtures can improve the fluidity and hydration degree of cement paste, thereby enhancing the mechanical properties of the material.
This work investigates the synergistic utilization of EVA, TEA and C-S-Hs-PCE as admixtures in Portland cement. The alteration of hydration process is measured by isothermal calorimetry (ICC) and the effects of admixtures on mechanical properties are evaluated by the development of strengths and apparent density. The mechanism of admixtures acting in cement is revealed via XRD, FT-IR and TGA techniques. Results show that the fluidity of fresh cement paste is significantly improved with the addition of EVA, TEA and C-S-Hs-PCE, and consequently to the increasing in workability. The admixtures accelerate the hydration process and increase the cumulative heat release, deepening the hydration degree of cement paste. Both the improvement of fluidity and promotion of hydration are the important reasons for the enhancement of mechanical properties. Results of XRD, FT-IR and TGA indicate that the CH contents increase evidently with the content of admixtures, which further proves that the deepening of hydration process. This study could provide an experimental reference, which is of great significance to the valuable application of admixtures in cement based materials. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据