4.7 Article

CACDA: A knowledge graph for a context-aware cognitive design assistant

期刊

COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103377

关键词

Design rule; Knowledge graph; Knowledge management; Context-awareness; Cognitive assistant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integration of design rules and CAD software can be achieved through a knowledge graph that structures design rules in a computable format, facilitating the development of the data model and the definition of design context concept. Capturing design context in near real time and running reasoning operations on the knowledge graph can extend traditional CAD capabilities.
The design of complex engineered systems highly relies on a laborious zigzagging between computeraided design (CAD) software and design rules prescribed by design manuals. Despite the emergence of knowledge management techniques (ontology, expert system, text mining, etc.), companies continue to store design rules in large and unstructured documents. To facilitate the integration of design rules and CAD software, we propose a knowledge graph that structures a large set of design rules in a computable format. The knowledge graph organises entities of design rules (nodes), relationships among design rules (edges), as well as contextual information. The categorisation of entities and relationships in four subcontexts: semantic, social, engineering, and IT - facilitates the development of the data model, especially the definition of the design context concept. The knowledge graph paves the way to a context-aware cognitive design assistant. Indeed, connected to or embedded in a CAD software, a context-aware cognitive design assistant will capture the design context in near real time and run reasoning operations on the knowledge graph to extend traditional CAD capabilities, such as the recommendation of design rules, the verification of design solutions, or the automation of design routines. Our validation experiment shows that the current version of the context-aware cognitive design assistant is more efficient than the traditional document-based design. On average, participants using an unstructured design rules document have a precision of 0.36 whereas participants using our demonstrator obtain a 0.61 precision score. Finally, designers supported by the design assistant spend more time designing than searching for applicable design rules compared to the traditional design approach. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据