4.5 Article

PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM, WITH A FOCUS ON MANAGEMENT OF THE NORMOCALCEMIC FORM: TO TREAT OR NOT TO TREAT?

期刊

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 294-301

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4158/EP15704.OR

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine reasonable care for normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NCPHPT) patients treated at the endocrine clinic. Methods: The study is based on 218 outpatient cases of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), 187 (86%) of whom were NCPHPT. Subjective complaints, biochemical tests, imaging, and treatment outcome for NCPHPT patients were monitored and compared with the same parameters in patients with hypercalcemic hyperparathyroidism. The number of patients with newly diagnosed NCPHPT who became hypercalcemic and the time period in which it happened were also recorded. Results: Over 6 years of study, in total, 36 of 187 originally normocalcemic patients became hypercalcemic (19%); 24 of 36 within 2 years and 2 of 36 later than after 4 years. Sestamibi scintigraphy was performed in 103 normocalcemic patients (adenoma was detected in 5 cases) and in 46 hypercalcemic patients with pathologically elevated serum calcium levels at the time of assessment (adenoma was detected in 32 of 46 cases). Surgery was performed in 33 patients, 11 of whom were originally normocalcemic (i.e., 6% of all 187 originally normocalcemic patients), and 22 were hypercalcemic from the outset (i.e., 71% of all 31 originally hypercalcemic patients). Conclusion: Some NCPHPT patients converted to hypercalcemic, mostly within 2 years, but some after 4 years or later. Normocalcemic patients should be monitored on a long-term basis, as it is impossible to anticipate when and which normocalcemic patients will become hypercalcemic. Imaging is much less effective in normocalcemic than in hypercalcemic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据