4.7 Article

Mathematical formulations for the optimal sequencing and lot sizing in multiproduct synchronous assembly lines

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.107006

关键词

Multiproduct; Assembly line; Lot sizing; Sequencing; Optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an optimization approach based on a mixed-integer nonlinear mathematical programming model to optimize the operational cost of multi-product synchronous assembly lines. A two-stage solution strategy is introduced to improve the convergence and effectiveness of the model.
The study of multiproduct assembly lines producing several models in a series of runs or campaigns is of special interest to modern industries. Assuming that the assembly line makes synchronous movements between workstations, it is particularly important to determine the best sequence and size of lots that permit to fulfill product demands at minimum total cost. Different products usually have different cycle times yielding productivity reductions during transition periods. This work presents an optimization approach based on a mixed-integer nonlinear mathematical programming (MINLP) model aiming at optimizing the operational cost of multi-product synchronous assembly lines. The formulation provides a detailed representation of the production steps, accounting for the cycle time of every unit moving along the assembly line. It can also be applied to mixed model assembly lines, with no changeovers. We propose a two-stage solution strategy involving a preliminary estimation of the lot sizes followed by a detailed representation of the production cycles, whose convergence is improved by adding efficient integer cuts. This model overcomes the shortcomings of previous approaches based on the representation of production campaigns over continuous domains. We assess the effectiveness of the solution strategies by solving a variety of real sized problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据