4.5 Article

Segregation and embrittlement of gold grain boundaries

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110110

关键词

Grain boundary segregation; First principles calculations; Mechanical properties; Eshelby model; Experimental validation

资金

  1. COMET program within the K2 Center Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC-MPPE) [859480]
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK)
  3. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW)
  4. federal state of Styria
  5. federal state of Upper Austria
  6. federal state of Tyrol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the segregation behaviors of 27 alloying elements to an Au grain boundary and surface, identifying both detrimental and beneficial elements for alloying. The methodology and results are validated by comparing to experimental results from over two centuries, revealing the main origin of the grain boundary cohesion effect.
Grain boundary (GB) segregation of solutes can significantly alter material properties, the effects of which have first been observed more than two hundred years ago. After an introduction that shortly summarizes the historic development of the study of segregation, this work conducts an investigation on the segregation tendencies of 27 alloying elements to an Au GB and a surface with first principles calculations, semi-empirical modelling, and a phenomenological model of segregation. The effect of alloying elements on GB cohesion are evaluated and both detrimental (Bi, Cl, As, K) and beneficial elements (Al and the 3d transition metals) for alloying are identified. By comparing to experimental results from over two centuries, the used methodology and the obtained results are validated. The main origin of the GB cohesion effect can be revealed, i.e. the size mismatch between alloying elements and Au.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据