4.5 Article

Effects of active elements on adhesion of the Al2O3/Fe interface: A first principles calculation

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110226

关键词

Activating elements; Adhesion; Al2O3/Fe interface; First principles calculations

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0703101]
  2. Equipment Advance Research Fund [61409220102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of active elements (Ti and Ni) additives at the alumina/iron interface to enhance adhesion, with Ti showing improved strength and stability while Ni has minimal enhancement. Electron structure analysis reveals that Ti's coupling results in more electrons involved in interface interaction, leading to increased adhesion energy. The activation mechanism of Ti and Ni explains their different effects on interface binding in alumina reinforced iron matrix composites.
The poor wettability of alumina surface greatly limits the interface binding between alumina and iron in alumina reinforced iron matrix composites. In this work, the active elements (Ti and Ni) additives are introduced into the interface to enhance the adhesion of the interface, and the activation mechanism is studied. Through the analysis of the embedding ability of activating elements Ti or Ni in Al2O3/Fe interface and their influence on adhesion of interfaces, it is revealed that Ti is prone to segregation at the interface and has a great improvement on the strength and stability of interface binding. However, Ni hardly enhances interface interaction and even causes interface deterioration. Electron structures analysis shows that 4 s, 3p, 3d coupling of Ti results in more electrons involved in the interface interaction, and the formation of Ti-Fe and Ti-O bonds essentially determines the increase of the work of adhesion. The activation mechanism of Ti and Ni well explains the experimentally reported different existence forms and action modes of Ti and Ni.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据