4.7 Article

Enhancement of fiber-matrix adhesion in carbon fiber reinforced Al-matrix composites with an optimized electroless plating process

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106258

关键词

Metal-matrix composites (MMCs); Fiber/matrix bond; Mechanical testing; Surface treatments

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971048, 51501027, 51704029]
  2. Open Research Fund from State Key Laboratory of Metal Material for Marine Equipment and Application [SKLMEA-K201701]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20LAB141, N180203020]
  4. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2018M641701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An optimized electroless nickel plating process was studied to improve the interfacial adhesion of CF reinforced Al-matrix composites. By using Pd-colloid activation and SMA etching, the adhesion force and interfacial shear strength were significantly increased, resulting in a 35.9% higher ultimate tensile strength of the composites.
Coating is the most common method to offer better wettability between carbon fibers (CFs) and metal matrix of the composites. An optimal electmless Ni plating process was studied in this paper to improve the interfacial adhesion of CF reinforced Al-matrix composites. By using Pd-colloid activation, the typical island-like agglomeration on the coating surface was significantly eliminated, providing a 11, reduction of 56.5%. Applying strongoxidizing mixed acid (SMA) etching provided larger adhesion force (140.53 nN) and interfacial shear strength (IFSS) (35.1 MPa) than that of the original process (53.72 nN and 31.1 MPa), which can be attributed to rougher surface and larger numbers of carboxyl functional groups on CF surface. By combining these processes, the adhesion force further increased to 207.99 nN with improved IFSS to 40.9 MPa, and Rq was reduced by 72.1%. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the composites increased to 140 MPa, which is 35.9% higher than that with CFs by original method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据