4.5 Article

Performance Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis of Rural Land Circulation Mode

期刊

COMPLEXITY
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6615306

关键词

-

资金

  1. Anhui University Humanities and Social Science Research Key Project [SK2019A0526]
  2. Social Science Innovation and Development Research Project of Anhui Province in 2020 [2020CX104]
  3. Key Teaching and Research Project of Provincial Quality Engineering Project of Anhui Universities [2020jyxm2213]
  4. Start Project of Scientific Research by Professor and Doctor of Suzhou University [2015JB11]
  5. massive open online courses (MOOC) of the provincial quality project of Anhui Provincial Higher Education Institutions [2016mooc301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of various rural land circulation modes was evaluated using the analytic network hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. The results showed that higher revenue leads to reduced difficulty in land circulation, while cost variables are negatively correlated with selected modes. Higher risk increases the difficulty of rural land circulation.
To evaluate the performance of rural land circulation mode through the analytic network hierarchy process, based on the results of the performance evaluation with analytic network process, we implemented efficiency analysis on five types of rural land circulation mode by two improved efficiency analytic procedures. Finally, we implemented sensitivity analysis for each criterion layer of the evaluation index system with the performance evaluation data, interpreted five types of rural land circulation mode from three perspectives including benefits, costs, and risks with sensitivity analysis results, and drew related conclusions including higher revenue which will lead to smaller difficulty of the rural land circulation. Cost variables were negative variables of the selected rural land circulation mode, and higher risk would lead to the greater difficulty of rural land circulation and related conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据