4.6 Article

CO2-responsive preformed gel particles with interpenetrating networks for controlling CO2 breakthrough in tight reservoirs

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.126065

关键词

CO2-responsive preformed gel particles; Gas channeling; Enhanced oil recovery; Tight reservoirs

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904255, U19B2010]
  2. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2019YFG0148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By synthesizing novel CO2-responsive preformed gel particles with interpenetrating networks (IPN-ASSAP), the breakthrough of CO2 can be effectively mitigated and plugging efficiency can be improved. Experimental results indicated that IPN-PAASP has great potential for fracture plugging during CO2 flooding.
Horizontal well re-fracturing of tight reservoirs triggers complex fractures, which induces severe gas channeling and low sweeping efficiency in CO2 flooding due to the significance difference in permeability between matrix and fractures. Herein, novel CO2-responsive preformed gel particles with interpenetrating networks (IPN-ASSAP) was synthesized to mitigate CO2 breakthrough. To reveal the plugging efficiency and EOR potential of IPN-PAASP, the change in particle size distribution, microstructure, strength, and rheology were characterized, followed by core flooding experiments. Experimental results indicated that after IPN-ASSAP contacted with CO2, the median diameter and strength of particles were enhanced due to protonation reaction of IPN-PAASP. Moreover, after IPN-PAASP was injected into fractured core, injection pressure increased from 5.0 kPa to 0.342 MPa with plugging efficiency of 99 %. During water flooding and CO2 flooding, the crude oil in fracture was displaced with oil recovery of 17.1 %. After plugging was formed, injected CO2 entered matrix, and recovery factor increased by 23.1 %. All the experiment results indicated that IPN-PAASP is a promising candidate for fracture plugging during CO2 flooding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据