4.5 Article

The effect of proprioceptive training on postural control in people with diabetes: A randomized clinical trial comparing delivery at home, under supervision, or no training

期刊

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 988-998

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215521989016

关键词

Diabetes mellitus; exercise therapy; proprioceptive training; postural control

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2014/190836]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  3. Foundation for Support to Teaching, Research and Assistance of the Hospital of the Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo (FAEPA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both supervised and home proprioceptive training did not lead to significant improvements in postural control, gait, or performance on functional tests in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Objective: Analyze postural control in the bipedal position as well as during gait and functional tests in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after supervised and unsupervised proprioceptive training. Design: A three-group randomized controlled trial. Setting: Physiotherapeutic Resources Lab, Department of Health Sciences, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo Subjects: Eighty patients with type 2 diabetes allocated to three groups: control, home training, and supervised training. Interventions: The supervised and home training groups performed two weekly sessions of proprioceptive exercises for 12 weeks. The control group was not submitted to any of treatment. Main measures: Bipedal balance, gait, and performance on functional tests were evaluated before and after 12 weeks using the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and the force plate. Results: No significant improvements were found regarding postural control, gait, or performance on the functional tests, as evidenced by the inter-group comparisons of the total BESTest score [control: 90.7 (81.5-92.6); home training: 85.2 (77.8-90.3); supervised training: 88.4 (82.6-91.4), P > 0.05] as well as the tests performed on the force plate (P > 0.05). The clinical effect size of the proposed intervention was less than 0.2, demonstrating no effect for the main outcome variable evaluated by the Sensory Orientation item of the BESTest and by the mCTSIB (pressure plate). Conclusions: The proposed proprioceptive training did not lead to improvements in postural control in patients with type 2 diabetes with no clinical signs of diabetic distal polyneuropathy when analyzed using the BESTest clinical evaluation and a force plate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据