4.5 Article

Two-piece zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns: Six-year results of a prospective cohort study

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 695-701

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13734

关键词

clinical trial; dental implants; zirconia

资金

  1. Dentalpoint AG, Zurich, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This prospective clinical trial presented the 6-year outcomes of a two-piece zirconia implant system in partially edentulous patients. After 6 years, the implant survival rate was high and patients were satisfied with the treatment. Despite potential complications such as abutment fracture in the long term, the two-piece implant system showed potential as an alternative treatment option.
Objectives The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to present the 6-year outcomes of a two-piece yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) implant system in partially edentulous patients. Material and methods Forty-nine two-piece zirconia implants were placed in 32 patients systemically healthy. Zirconia abutments were connected with adhesive resin cement. Single-unit full-ceramic crowns were cemented. The cases have been followed for an average of 82.2 +/- 5.86 months after loading (range 74.93-92.26 months). Results 24 participants with 39 implants were available for examination 6 years after loading. The cumulative implant survival rate was 83%. On an implant level, the cumulative mechanical complication rate was 17.5%, the cumulative technical complication rate was 13%, and the biological complication rate was 8%. After 6 years, subjects reported good satisfaction with the treatment: 3.7 +/- 4.4 on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 mm. Conclusions Within the limitations of this prospective case series study, two-piece zirconia implants could offer an alternative for treatment of single edentulous spaces in the posterior region. The major complication on the long term of this pioneering system was the abutment fracture; however, due to the versatility of a two-piece implant system, replacement of the broken parts was possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据