Quantitative assessment of visual pathway function in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients

Objective: The current methods used to assess visual function in blind retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients are mostly subjective. We aimed to identify effective, objective methods. Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with blindness associated with RP; we finally selected 26 patients (51 eyes) with a visual field radius less than 10 degrees and divided them into the following 4 groups by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA): group 1, no light perception (NLP, 4 eyes); group 2, light perception (LP, 12 eyes); group 3, hand movement or finger counting (faint form perception, FFP, 22 eyes); and group 4, BCVA from 0.1 to 0.8 (form perception, FP, 13 eyes). All patients underwent optometry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), full field electroretinography (ffERG), pattern electroretinography (PERG), multifocal electroretinography (mf-ERG), pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP), flash visual evoked potential (FVEP), and pupillary light response (PLR) assessments. Five patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 (1, 2, and 2 subjects, respectively) under went functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans and were compared with five healthy subjects. Results: The outer plexiform layer was thinner in group 1, and the outer nuclear layer was thinner in groups 1 and 2. The ffERG, PERG, and mf-ERG findings were unrecordable in all four groups. The P2 amplitude of the FVEP was significantly lower in groups 1 and 2, while the P100 amplitude of the PVEP was higher in groups 2, 3 and 4 than in group 1. After whiteand blue-light stimuli, the PLR thresholds in the patients without form perception were significantly higher. The threshold of the PLR stimulated by blue and white light was negatively correlated with the amplitudes of P2 and P100. Moreover, the fMRI findings showed that some RP patients have significant visual cortex activation in response to certain types of stimulation. However, statistical analysis was not performed because of the small number of cases. Conclusions: OCT, VEP, PLR and fMRI assessments can evaluate residual visual pathway function in blind RP patients. Significance: Our study may have clinical significance for the potential prediction of RP patient prognoses and the effects after clinical trials. (c) 2020 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Automated summary

The study found that assessment methods for visual function in RP patients need to be more objective and effective, and that OCT, VEP, PLR, and fMRI evaluations can assess residual visual pathway function in blind RP patients.