4.7 Review

Antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department: characteristics and evidence for effectiveness of interventions

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 204-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.028

关键词

Antibiotic; Antimicrobial; Antimicrobial stewardship; Emergency department; Interventions; Stewardship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emergency departments serve as the entrance gates for patients with infectious diseases and are an important unit for targeted antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Most antimicrobial stewardship programmes are focused on inpatient management, overlooking the equally high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use in the ED setting. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen the focus and intervention on antimicrobial stewardship in the ED.
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are the entrance gates for patients presenting with infectious diseases into the hospital, yet most antimicrobial stewardship programmes are primarily focused on inpatient management. With equally high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use, the ED is a frequently overlooked yet important unit for targeted antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. Objectives: We aimed to (a) describe the specific aspects of antimicrobial stewardship in the ED and (b) summarize the findings from improvement studies that have investigated the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in the ED setting. Sources: : (a) a PubMed search for 'antimicrobial stewardship' and 'emergency department', and (b) published reviews on effectiveness combined with publications from the first source. Content: : (a) An in depth analysis of selected publications provided four key antimicrobial use processes typically performed by front-line healthcare professionals in the ED: making a (tentative) clinical diagnosis, starting empirical therapy based on that diagnosis, performing microbiological tests before starting that therapy and following up patients who are discharged from the ED. (b) Further, we discuss the literature on improvement strategies in the ED focusing on guidelines and clinical pathways and multifaceted improvement strategies. We also summarize the evidence of microbiologic culture review. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据