4.7 Article

Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes

期刊

CHEST
卷 159, 期 6, 页码 2356-2365

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052

关键词

novel measurement; physiology; plethysmograph; pulmonary function test; total lung capacity

资金

  1. PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd., at the Burlington, Vermont
  2. PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd., at the Barcelona, Spain
  3. PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd., at the Enschede, The Netherlands
  4. PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd., at the New York, New York

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to compare the reliability of a novel MiniBox system with traditional whole body plethysmography for measuring lung volumes. The results show that there were no significant differences between TLC values obtained by the MiniBox system and conventional measurement methods, as well as no significant differences among different conditions and centers.
BACKGROUND: Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. RESEARCH QUESTION: Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLCPleth) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLCMB). RESULTS: TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLCPleth and TLCMB was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% inmoderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers. INTERPRETATION: TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据