4.7 Article

Biosorption of iron ions through microalgae from wastewater and soil: Optimization and comparative study

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129172

关键词

Environment; Microalgae; Iron; Water; Soil; Bioremediation

资金

  1. CSC (China Scholarship Council, PR China)
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgae were evaluated for their ability to remove Fe2+ iron ions from aqueous solutions, with five strains showing promising results in terms of bioremediation efficiency for both wastewater and soil. This study suggests that these selected microalgae strains have high potential as bioremediation tools for Fe2+ contaminated water and soil.
Microalgae play a significant role in wastewater and soil-bioremediation due to their low-cost and ecofriendly nature. In this study, 21 strains of microalgae were evaluated during removal of iron Fe2+ from aqueous solutions. Out of 21 strains, five strains (S. obliquus, C. fusca, C. saccharophila, A. braunn, and Leptolyngbya JSC-1) were selected based on their comparative tolerance for the iron Fe2+. These strains were further studied for their Fe2+ removal efficiency. The results indicated that the selected strains could maintain normal growth pattern up to 50 ppm of Fe2+, while the concentration beyond 50 ppm inhibited the growth. The Fe2+ bio-removal efficiencies from wastewater were 97, 98, 97.5, 99, and 99.9%, respectively. Similarly, in soil the bio-removal efficiencies of the five strains were measured as 76, 77, 76, 77.5, and 79%, repectively. A slight increase in leakage of protein and nucleic acids was observed in all strains, which is unlikely could be the reason of iron exposure as similar pattern was also found in control groups. Current results suggested that the selected five strains have high potential to be used as bioremediation tools for Fe2+ contaminated water and soil. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据