4.7 Article

Hydrolysis of FTOH precursors, a simple method to account for some of the unknown

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130044

关键词

PFAS; PFAS precursors; FTOH; Hydrolysis; TOF; TOP

资金

  1. Norwegian Environment Agency [18087116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the suspected presence of unknown PFAS in consumer goods and the environment, proposing hydrolysis of precursors as a complementary method for explaining the unknown PFAS. The research shows that hydrolysis can preserve structural information on perfluorinated parts of the precursors and detect hidden FTOHs in textile samples up to 1300-fold higher levels.
There is a growing concern over a suspected presense of unknown perfluoroaliphatic substances (PFAS) in consumer goods and in the environment. Such unknown substances, possibly with high molecular weight, might be precursors of hazardous or controlled known PFAS. Recent studies confirmed that total organic fluorine (TOF) content often can not be explained by the measured target PFAS. One of the suspected classes of such unknowns are polymers with fluorotelomer alcohol (FTOH) residues in a side chain. In this report we suggest hydrolysis of precursors, as a complementary method to account for the unknown PFAS. It was shown here that hydrolysis allows to preserve structural information on the perlfuorinated parts of the precursors, which can be an advantage for the purpose of accurate risk assessment or source identification. A convenient procedure for hydrolysis with 4% sodium hydroxide in water-methanol mixture (1:9) at 60 degrees C for 16 h was shown to convert model substances - FTOH acrylate, methacrylate and isobutyrate esters as well as FTOH phenylcarbamate to free FTOHs. Analysis of extracts of textile samples with preliminary hydrolysis and without it showed up to 1300-fold higher level of hidden FTOHs. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据