4.5 Article

Synthesis and Assessment of Fused β-Carboline Derivatives as Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonists

期刊

CHEMMEDCHEM
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1917-1926

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202100029

关键词

beta-carboline; kappa opioid receptor agonist; molecular modeling; nitrogen heterocycle; pain

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi
  2. University Grants Commission, New Delhi
  3. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi
  4. Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi
  5. Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi [MoES/09-DS/07/2014 PC-IV]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of new fused beta-carboline derivatives led to the discovery of two compounds with significant agonistic activity on KOR, which were found to be extremely G-protein-biased agonists. These compounds demonstrated analgesic effects in mice, without inducing sedation, and their interaction with the human KOR was studied for rationalization of the results.
The synthesis of 5-formyl-6-aryl-6H-indolo[3,2,1-de][1,5] naphthyridine-2-carboxylates by reaction between 1-formyl-9H-beta-carbolines and cinnamaldehydes in the presence of pyrrolidine in water with microwave irradiation is described. Pharmacophoric modification of the formyl group offered several new fused beta-carboline derivatives, which were investigated for their kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonistic activity. Two compounds 4 a and 4 c produced appreciable agonist activity on KOR with EC50 values of 46 +/- 19 and 134 +/- 9 nM, respectively. Moreover, compound-induced KOR signaling studies suggested both compounds to be extremely G-protein-biased agonists. The analgesic effect of 4 a was validated by the increase in tail flick latency in mice in a time-dependent manner, which was completely blocked by the KOR-selective antagonist norBNI. Moreover, unlike U50488, an unbiased full KOR agonist, 4 a did not induce sedation. The docking of 4 a with the human KOR was studied to rationalize the result.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据