4.5 Article

Longibramides A-E, Peptaibols Isolated from a Mushroom Derived Fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum Rifai DMG-3-1-1

期刊

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202100128

关键词

Peptaibol; longibramide; mushroom; Trichoderma longibrachiatum; antibacterial activity; cytotoxicity

资金

  1. China Agricultural University Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five new peptaibols, longibramides A-E, were isolated from a fungus collected from the subboreal area of northeast China. The structures and absolute configurations of these peptaibols were determined through spectroscopic data and X-ray diffractions. Longibramides B and E showed moderate cytotoxicities and inhibitory effects against MRSA T144, with unique amino acid residues not commonly found in natural peptaibols.
Five new peptaibols, longibramides A-E (1-5) with 11 amino acid residues, were isolated from a fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum Rifai DMG-3-1-1, which was isolated from a mushroom Clitocybe nebularis (Batsch) P. Kumm collected from coniferous forest in the subboreal area of northeast China. The structures of longibramides A-E were determined by their spectroscopic data (NMR and MS-MS spectra), their absolute configurations were determined by X-ray diffractions and Marfey's analyses. The X-ray diffractions of longibramides A, B, and the similar CD spectra of A-E showed that they all had alpha-helix conformations. Longibramides B and E showed moderate cytotoxicities against BV2 and MCF-7 cells and also showed some inhibitory effects against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA T144. L-trans-Hyp was not commonly found in natural peptaibols, which was the 6(th) or 10(th) amino acid residue in longibramides C-E. The X-ray diffractions of longibramides A and B afforded the accuracy conformations of their secondary structures, which maybe help to interpret the structure-activity relationships of the family of peptaibols in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据