4.7 Article

Phenolic-rich smoothie consumption ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obesity mice by increasing antioxidant response

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 336, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109369

关键词

Phenolic compounds; Tropical fruit; Liver steatosis; Obesity; Antioxidant capacity; Adipose tissue

资金

  1. FAPERJ [E-26/202.829/2015, E-26/010.002632/2014]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [472711/2013-0]
  3. Embrapa SEG [03.14.13.002.00]
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brazil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regular consumption of a phenolic-rich smoothie can improve liver antioxidant status, prevent metabolic disorders, and ameliorate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease caused by high-fat diet consumption.
Consumption of foods rich in phenolic compounds can be beneficial for health. This study aimed to examine whether the consumption of a phenolic-rich smoothie, based on jucara, strawberry and banana, ameliorates metabolic status and liver damage of diet-induced obese mice. Forty male C57BL/6J mice were assigned into four groups (n = 10) and fed control diet with free access to water (C) or phenolic-rich smoothie (C-S), or fed high-fat diet with free access to water (HF) or phenolic-rich smoothie (HF-S) for five weeks. HF and HF-S groups had higher body weight gains than the C group, however the HF had a greater adipose index, higher plasma levels of glucose, insulin and leptin, as well as higher plasma and hepatic steatosis than C, C-S and HF-S groups. The liver oxidative stress markers were reduced in C-S and HF-S groups and the activity of catalase and glutathione peroxidase were higher compared with their counterparts. The present study suggests that regular consumption of a phenolic-rich smoothie improves the liver antioxidant status, prevents metabolic disorders and ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease caused by high-fat diet consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据