4.6 Article

Derivative-free level-set-based multi-objective topology optimization of flow channel designs using lattice Boltzmann method

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116323

关键词

Multi-objective topology optimization; Flow channel design; Level-set method; Lattice Boltzmann method; Immersed boundary method; Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706182, 21706187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A derivative-free level-set-based topology optimization method (DFLS-TO) utilizing QPSO for optimizing level-set values and interpolating values using Laplace equation was proposed. This method efficiently searches for optimal level-set values in multi-objective problems and uses the B-spline method to convert boundaries into smooth forms. The optimization of a pipe bend and a fluid distributor was demonstrated to show the applicability of DFLS-TO.
A derivative-free level-set-based topology optimization method (DFLS-TO) was proposed and was used for channel structure design. Unlike in a conventional level-set method, quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) was used in DFLS-TO to optimize the level-set values at the knot points. The values at the non-knot points were interpolated by solving the Laplace equation. QPSO was combined with the Tchebycheff decomposition method to search for optimal level-set values in multi-objective problems. The channel boundary was represented by an iso-contour of the level-set function, and the B-spline method was used to convert the zigzag-like boundary into a smooth boundary. The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) was integrated with the immersed boundary method to simulate the fluid flow. The Spalart-Allmaras model was incorporated with the LBM during the simulation of turbulent flows. To demonstrate the applicability of DFLS-TO, optimization of a pipe bend and a fluid distributor were performed. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据