4.7 Article

CO2 mineralization and concurrent utilization for nickel conversion from nickel silicates to nickel sulfides

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 406, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126761

关键词

CO2 mineralization; Mineral carbonation; Concurrent enhanced metal recovery (cEMR); Nickel sulfide; Sulfidization; Olivine

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Giga Metals [CRDPJ 523097 - 17]
  3. University of British Columbia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a method to address the dual challenges of global warming and nickel supply by utilizing CO2 mineralization for simultaneous mineral carbonation and nickel sulfidization. By releasing nickel ions, converting them into nickel sulfide, and reacting with other metal ions, stable carbonates are formed. Continuous supply of sulfide ions and CO2 is crucial for achieving selective nickel conversion and mineral carbonation.
Global warming due to increased greenhouse CO2 gas emissions and increasing nickel demand are two issues that are challenging the sustainable development of the modern world. These challenges can be met in one process whereby CO2 mineralization can be utilized for simultaneous mineral carbonation to stabilize CO2 gas and concurrent nickel sulfidization. The newly formed nickel sulfide may be recovered by conventional means to enhance industrial nickel supply. Mineral carbonation provides the pre-condition for nickel sulfidization to release nickel into aqueous solution from the crystal structure of olivine as a secondary nickel resource. The released nickel ions can be converted to nickel sulfide for further recovery while other bivalent metal ions such as Mg2+ can concurrently react with CO2 to form stable carbonates. The continuous supply of sulfide ions and CO2 is important to achieve selective nickel conversion and mineral carbonation. A mixed gas containing 5% H2S - 95% CO2 can accelerate mineral carbonation and form nickel sulfide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据