4.7 Article

Photoluminescence of graphene quantum dots enhanced by microwave post-treatment

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126714

关键词

Graphene quantum dots; Post-treatment; Microwave; Layered double hydroxides; Quantum yields

资金

  1. National Pre-research Foundation of China [6140208010201, 61402080104, JXXX-2019058]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP) [PPZY2015B128]
  4. Jiangsu Students innovation and entrepreneurship training program [201810291094Y]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51202111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that synthesizing GQDs/layered double hydroxides and microwave post-treatment can enhance the photoluminescence quantum yields of GQDs. This work points out a new direction for improving the PLQYs of GQDs and demonstrates the potential application in outdoor anti-counterfeiting inks.
Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have a great potential in sensors and bioimaging for their lower toxicity, perfect water solubility and bright luminescence. However, considerable efforts still need to devote to enhance the photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs) of GQDs. At first, high PLQYs are guaranteed by confined synthesizing GQDs/layered double hydroxides (LDHs) with well-defined structure. Followed by a convenient microwave post-treatment, PLQYs of GQDs are further improved from 21.0% to 34.6%. After microwave post -treatment, the integrity of pi-conjugated system has been enhanced and non-radiative processes also have been reduced inside GQDs, which both confirmed to be responsible for the improvement of PL properties. This work may point out a new direction for enhancing the PLQYs of GQDs. Moreover, owing to the stability and well PL performance of GQDs/LDHs, it has a great potential application in the outdoor anti-counterfeiting inks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据