4.4 Review

Electron Microscopy Imaging Applications of Room Temperature Ionic Liquids in the Biological Field: A Review

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 22, 期 15, 页码 2488-2506

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100041

关键词

Ionic Liquids; Electron Microscopy; Biology; Life Science; in  situ Electron Microscopy; Imaging

资金

  1. McMaster Faculty of Engineering Big Ideas fund
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant Program [RGPIN-2020-05722]
  3. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship (Vanier CGS) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) have been proposed as an alternative to traditional lengthy preparation methods for biological imaging using electron microscopy, allowing for imaging of hard-to-image soft and/or wet samples without dehydration. Future research avenues should focus on RTIL selection and optimization, applications for live cell processes, and electron beam and ionic liquid interaction studies.
For biological imaging using electron microscopy (EM), the use of room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) has been proposed as an alternative to traditional lengthy preparation methods. With their low vapor pressures and conductivity, RTILs can be applied onto hard-to-image soft and/or wet samples without dehydration - allowing for a more representative, hydrated state of material and opening the possibility for visualization of in situ physiological processes using conventional EM systems. However, RTILs have yet to be utilized to their full potential by microscopists and microbiologists alike. To this end, this review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of biological applications of RTILs for EM to bridge the RTIL, in situ microscopy, and biological communities. We outline future research avenues for the use of RTILs for the EM observation of biological samples, notably i) RTIL selection and optimization, ii) applications for live cell processes and iii) electron beam and ionic liquid interaction studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据