4.7 Article

On semi analytical and numerical simulations for a mathematical biological model; the time-fractional nonlinear Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov (KPP) equation

期刊

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110676

关键词

Fractional nonlinear KPP equation; Computational; Semi-analytical and numerical simulations

资金

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines semi-analytical and numerical solutions of the time-fractional nonlinear Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov (KPP) equation using five latest numerical schemes. The model's solution represents the proliferation of a favored gene, and moving waves are pursued by nonlinear interaction. The obtained numerical solutions' consistency is examined through measuring the absolute error between the exact and numerical solutions.
Through five latest numerical schemes (Adomian decomposition (AD), El Kalla (EK), cubic B -spline (CBS), expanded Cubic B-Spline (ECBS), exponential cubic B -spline (ExCBS), this manuscript examines semi-analytical and numerical solutions of the time-fractional nonlinear Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov (KPP) equation. Using the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and expanded Riccati -expansion process in Hamed et al.(2020) [1], developed computational solutions are investigated to determine the sufficient conditions for the implementation of the above-suggested schemes. In combustion theory, mathematical biology, and other study fields, the quasi-linear model is parabolic in simulating specific reaction-diffusion systems. The model's solution represents the proliferation of a favored gene, and moving waves are pursued by nonlinear interaction. By measuring the absolute error between the exact and numerical solutions, the obtained numerical solutions' consistency is examined. To explain the correspondence between the exact and numerical solutions, several sketches are given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据