4.7 Article

Social dilemmas in off-lattice populations

期刊

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110743

关键词

Social dilemmas; Cooperation; Off-lattice simulations

资金

  1. Fundacao Araucaria
  2. INCT-FCx (CNPq/FAPESP) [141260/2017-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the consequences of spatial reciprocity on the evolution of cooperation through off-lattice population approach and compares the results with lattice-type interaction graphs. The findings suggest that spatial reciprocity may work more efficiently in off-lattice populations and competing strategies may separate in the continuous space concept, providing opportunities for cooperators to survive even at high temptation values, but the lack of strict neighborhood jeopardizes the long term stability of homogeneous domains.
Exploring the possible consequences of spatial reciprocity on the evolution of cooperation is an inten -sively studied research avenue. Related works assumed a certain interaction graph of competing players and studied how particular topologies may influence the dynamical behavior. In this paper we apply a numerically more demanding off-lattice population approach which could be potentially relevant es-pecially in microbiological environments. As expected, results are conceptually similar to those which were obtained for lattice-type interaction graphs, but some spectacular differences can also be revealed. On one hand, in off-lattice populations spatial reciprocity may work more efficiently than for a lattice-based system. On the other hand, competing strategies may separate from each other in the continuous space concept, which gives a chance for cooperators to survive even at relatively high temptation values. Furthermore, the lack of strict neighborhood results in soft borders between competing patches which jeopardizes the long term stability of homogeneous domains. We survey the major social dilemma games based on pair interactions of players and reveal all analogies and differences compared to on-lattice sim-ulations. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据