4.7 Review

Tribological mechanism of micro-arc oxidation coatings prepared by different electrolyte systems in artificial seawater

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 7344-7352

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.169

关键词

Titanium; Micro-arc oxidation; Different electrolyte; Tribological mechanism; Seawater environment

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA13040602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975563]
  3. Key R&D Programs in Zhejiang Province [2020C03102]
  4. Major Project of Ningbo Science and Technology Innovation 2025 [2018B10028]
  5. Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Gansu Province [2018D-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adding silicate can increase the density of the coating, and phosphate-aluminate ceramic layer exhibits the lowest wear rate in various environments. The friction coefficient and wear rate of MAO coating in seawater are lower than those in ambient air due to the boundary lubrication effect of seawater, with the presence of divalent metal salts making seawater more lubricous than other salt solutions.
The micro-arc oxidation (MAO) coatings were prepared in four different electrolyte systems, including mixed acid, phosphate, phosphate-aluminate and phosphate-silicate electrolytes. The friction and wear properties of MAO coatings in ambient air, seawater and four groups of saline solutions related to seawater were investigated. The results showed that the addition of silicate to phosphate could increase the density of the coating. The phosphate-aluminate ceramic layer exhibited the lowest wear rate in various environments. Additionally, the friction coefficient and wear rate of MAO coating in seawater were lower than those in ambient air, which was due to the boundary lubrication effect of seawater. Meanwhile, the presence of divalent metal salts in seawater made its lubricity better than other salt solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据