4.7 Article

Immobilization of simulated An3+ into synthetic Gd2Zr2O7 ceramic by SPS without occupation or valence design

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 6329-6335

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.211

关键词

SPS; Gd2Zr2O7 ceramic; Simulated An(3+); Solubility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507105, 51702298]
  2. Science Development Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics
  3. State Key Laboratory of Environment-friendly Energy Materials, Southwest University of Science and Technology [18fksy0213]
  4. Open Foundation of Hubei Key Laboratory of Plasma Chemistry and Advanced Materials [2020K05]
  5. Research Fund Program of Guangdong Key Laboratory of Radioactive and Rare Resource Utilization [2019-LRRRU02]
  6. Dean Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics [YZJJLX2017009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of Nd2O3 doping amount on the sintering characteristics of Gd2Zr2O7 ceramic immobilized simulated An(3+) were investigated, showing that an increase in Nd2O3 doping amount leads to a decrease in density and Vickers hardness values of the sintered ceramics.
To simplify the immobilized process of nuclear waste, synthetic Gd2Zr2O7 ceramic was employed to immobilize simulated An(3+) (Nd3+) by spark plasma sintering (SPS) without any ion occupation or valence design. Sintering and characterization of immobilized simulated An(3+) with various doping amounts were carried out. The effects of Nd2O3 content on the phase composition, active modes, micro-graph and density of the sintered ceramics were investigated. When the Nd2O3 doped amount reached up to 50 mol%, the raw peak of Nd2O3 existed. The sintered ceramics kept a single fluorite phase when Nd2O3 solubility achieved to 40 mol%. The sintered ceramics presented a well crystalline phase and the elements distributed evenly. In addition, as the Nd2O3 doped amount increase, the density and Vickers hardness values of Nd2O3 doped sample decrease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据