4.7 Article

Towards anti-angiogenic activity of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 16152-16161

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.191

关键词

Polymeric precursor method; Surfactant; Anti-angiogenic

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) under CEPID/CDMF [2013/07296-2]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq [573636/2008-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, NiFe2O4 nanoparticles were prepared using the polymeric precursor method with or without CTAB as a surfactant. The addition of CTAB significantly enhanced the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles and demonstrated anti-angiogenic activity in the study.
In this study, NiFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared using the polymeric precursor method and calcined at 500?C for 4 h with (S? NiFe2O4) and without (NiFe2O4) CTAB as a surfactant, respectively. The magnetic and biological properties were evaluated based on the (micro)structure and electronic structure of the NPs. On sample S?NiFe2O4, the significant increase in magnetization saturation (Ms - 61.84 emu/g), magnetic remanence (Mr - 4.30 emu/g), and coercivity (Hc - 0.475 kOe) in comparison to sample NiFe2O4 (Ms - 24.81 emu/g, Mr - 1.00 emu/g, and Hc - 0.475 kOe) at room temperature (300 K) may be associated with the presence of oxygen vacancies the spinel lattice of NiFe2O4, generating magnetic moments. The concentration of 1 ?g/mL S?NiFe2O4 decreased in -50% angiogenesis in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). S?NiFe2O4 NPs showed high blood vessel affinity and anti-angiogenic activity; hence, effectively concentrating on tumoral vessels, which may enhance drug effectivity and enable simultaneous treatments, image diagnosis of solid tumors, etc. Thus, our results suggest that CTAB addition is an effective way to tune its magnetic response due to its excellent biocompatibility, high bulk saturation magnetization, and low magnetic anisotropy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据