4.7 Article

Optimisation on the stability of CaO-doped partially stabilised zirconia by microwave heating

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 8067-8074

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.161

关键词

Microwave heating; Calcium oxide doped partially stabilised zirconia; Stability ratio; Phase transition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51764052]
  2. Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) at the University of Yunnan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized controllable microwave heating to improve the stability of partially stabilized zirconia, and found that the stability increased with higher heating temperatures. Experimental results indicated that the martensitic transformation temperature of zirconia was reduced under microwave radiation.
Partially stabilised zirconia has advantages for the applications in the metallurgical processes which have special requirements in corrosion resistance and high-temperature performance. In the present work, controllable microwave heating was used for the uniform thermal field and consequent microstructure improvement to further improve the stability of partially stabilised zirconia, which was 88.14% prepared by electric arc melting. Analyses including X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy (Raman) were used to study the effect of temperature change on the phase composition and structure of the samples. After heating at temperatures of 900 degrees C, 1000 degrees C, 1100 degrees C, 1200 degrees C and 1300 degrees C for 1h, the stabilities of the heated product were 88.51%, 95.02%, 95.17%, 96.31% and 97.64%, respectively. From the phase transformations based on the experimental results, the discussion indicates that the martensitic transformation temperature of zirconia from m-ZrO2 to t-ZrO2 during the heating stage was reduced under the radiation of microwave energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据