4.7 Article

Synthesis and physicochemical characterization of Zn-doped brushite

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 7798-7804

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.125

关键词

Calcium phosphate cements; Brushite; Zinc; FTIR; PXRD; SEM

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2016/22/E/ST5/00564]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) enriched with different amounts of Zn2+ ions was synthesized in aqueous solution via standard precipitation method. Characterization tests confirmed the successful introduction of zinc ions into the DCPD crystal, making it a promising material for mineralized tissue engineering.
Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) enriched by different amounts of Zn2+ ions was synthesised in aqueous solution via standard precipitation method. The obtained powders were characterised by powder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD), infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). These tests confirmed that all the powders were highly microcrystalline brushite. As the concentration of zinc increased, an additional crystalline phase of alpha-hopeite appeared, and, simultaneously, the crystallinity of brushite slightly decreased. Moreover, according to the shifts of PXRD, FTIR and P-31 ssNMR line positions, it was proved that zinc ions were successfully introduced into the crystal of DCPD. The (Ca + Zn)/P molar ratio calculated from ICP-OES results was ca. 1.0, which is typical for DCPD; only the (Ca + Zn)/P molar ratio of the sample with the highest concentration of Zn slightly differs, which was caused by the presence of alpha-hopeite. SEM images have shown a high tendency of Zn-containing brushite to agglomerate into the spherical, compact clusters. The preliminary biological tests have shown that the powders are non-toxic, which makes them promising materials for potential use in mineralised tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据