4.7 Article

Core-shell structured Fe/ZnO composite with superior electromagnetic wave absorption performance

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 14506-14514

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.030

关键词

Fe; ZnO composite; Electromagnetic absorbing properties; Reflection loss

资金

  1. key scientific research projects of the Southwest University of Science and Technology [17zx910201]
  2. Longshan academic talent research supporting program of SWUST [18LZX437, 18LZXT09]
  3. Sichuan science and technology program [2017TD0020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Core-shell structured iron/zinc oxide (Fe/ZnO) nanocomposites were successfully prepared via a low-temperature wet chemical method, demonstrating excellent electromagnetic wave absorption performance and promising applications in the field of Ku band wave absorption.
Core-shell structured iron/zinc oxide (Fe/ZnO) nanocomposites have been successfully prepared via a lowtemperature wet chemical method. The electromagnetic wave absorbing performances of all the Fe/ZnO nanocomposites are significantly improved in comparison with single ?-Fe and ZnO. With the ZnO content increasing, the effective absorption band (reflection loss below -10 dB) moves toward the high frequency orientation. When the thickness is 1.59 mm, the Fe/ZnO nanocomposite with a Fe/Zn ratio of 1:0.75 can gain the optimal reflection loss at 15.55 GHz, which reaches up to -48.28 dB, and the effective absorption bandwidth (reflection loss below -10 dB) is 3.50 GHz (12.925?16.425 GHz). In addition, the maximum effective absorption bandwidth (reflection loss below -10 dB) reaches up to 5.10 GHz (10.79?15.89 GHz) at the thickness of 1.9 mm for Fe/Zn ratio of 1:0.75. The excellent electromagnetic wave absorption performance of Fe/ZnO nanocomposite benefits from the effects of dielectric loss, magnetic loss and suitable impedance matching. Therefore, the Fe/ ZnO nanocomposites are promising to be applied in the field of Ku band wave absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据