4.7 Article

CRISPR-Mediated Induction of Neuron-Enriched Mitochondrial Proteins Boosts Direct Glia-to-Neuron Conversion

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 524-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation Rodger de Spoelberch
  2. German Research Foundation [SFB870, SPP1757]
  3. advanced ERC ChroNeuroRepair
  4. ERAnet
  5. SyNergy-HMGU [ExNet-0041-Phase2-3]
  6. AMPro Project (Aging and Metabolic Programming) network funds of the Helmholtz Association
  7. [SPP2127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocyte-to-neuron conversion is a promising avenue for neuronal replacement therapy, with mitochondrial proteins playing a crucial role in the process. Early activation of genes encoding mitochondrial proteins significantly improves conversion efficiency, particularly for neuron-enriched antioxidant proteins.
Astrocyte-to-neuron conversion is a promising avenue for neuronal replacement therapy. Neurons are particularly dependent on mitochondrial function, but how well mitochondria adapt to the new fate is unknown. Here, we determined the comprehensive mitochondrial proteome of cortical astrocytes and neurons, identifying about 150 significantly enriched mitochondrial proteins for each cell type, including transporters, metabolic enzymes, and cell-type-specific antioxidants. Monitoring their transition during reprogramming revealed late and only partial adaptation to the neuronal identity. Early dCas9-mediated activation of genes encoding mitochondrial proteins significantly improved conversion efficiency, particularly for neuron-enriched but not astrocyte-enriched antioxidant proteins. For example, Sod1 not only improves the survival of the converted neurons but also elicits a faster conversion pace, indicating that mitochondrial proteins act as enablers and drivers in this process. Transcriptional engineering of mitochondrial proteins with other functions improved reprogramming as well, demonstrating a broader role of mitochondrial proteins during fate conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据