4.7 Review

Programmed cell death in spinal cord injury pathogenesis and therapy

期刊

CELL PROLIFERATION
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12992

关键词

pathological mechanisms; programmed cell death; spinal cord injury; therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81620108018, 82002309]
  2. Tianjin Medical University General Hospital [ZYYFY2019019, 209060401201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to functional deterioration due to cell death processes, including programmed cell death (PCD) like apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and paraptosis. PCD is an active cell death mediated by gene expression events, crucial for eliminating unnecessary and damaged cells and serves as a defense mechanism. Understanding the roles of PCD can enhance our knowledge of pathophysiological processes and improve functional recovery after SCI.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) always leads to functional deterioration due to a series of processes including cell death. In recent years, programmed cell death (PCD) is considered to be a critical process after SCI, and various forms of PCD were discovered in recent years, including apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis and paraptosis. Unlike necrosis, PCD is known as an active cell death mediated by a cascade of gene expression events, and it is crucial for elimination unnecessary and damaged cells, as well as a defence mechanism. Therefore, it would be meaningful to characterize the roles of PCD to not only enhance our understanding of the pathophysiological processes, but also improve functional recovery after SCI. This review will summarize and explore the most recent advances on how apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis and paraptosis are involved in SCI. This review can help us to understand the various functions of PCD in the pathological processes of SCI, and contribute to our novel understanding of SCI of unknown aetiology in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据