4.8 Article

Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity

期刊

CELL
卷 184, 期 9, 页码 2372-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM007753]
  2. VIC Innovation fund
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Investment [INV018944]
  4. NIH [R01 AI146779]
  5. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogenesis Readiness (MassCPR) grant
  6. Lambertus Family Foundation
  7. National Institutes for Drug Abuse (NIDA) Avenir New Innovator Award [DP2DA040254]
  8. MGH Transformative Scholars Program
  9. Charles H. Hood Foundation
  10. Gilead Sciences Research Scholars Program in HIV
  11. [T32AI007245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New variants of SARS-CoV-2 show high resistance to vaccine neutralization, with some able to escape vaccine responses with just a few mutations, highlighting the importance of developing broadly protective measures against variants.
Vaccination elicits immune responses capable of potently neutralizing SARS-CoV-2. However, ongoing surveillance has revealed the emergence of variants harboring mutations in spike, the main target of neutralizing antibodies. To understand the impact of these variants, we evaluated the neutralization potency of 99 individuals that received one or two doses of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines against pseudoviruses representing 10 globally circulating strains of SARS-CoV-2. Five of the 10 pseudoviruses, harboring receptorbinding domain mutations, including K417N/T, E484K, and N501Y, were highly resistant to neutralization. Cross-neutralization of B.1.351 variants was comparable to SARS-CoV and bat-derived WIV1-CoV, suggesting that a relatively small number of mutations can mediate potent escape from vaccine responses. While the clinical impact of neutralization resistance remains uncertain, these results highlight the potential for variants to escape from neutralizing humoral immunity and emphasize the need to develop broadly protective interventions against the evolving pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据